Legal Opinion

State of Or. v. City of Rajneeshpuram

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 16, 1984No. Civ. 84-359 FRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FRYE, Judge:

The matter before the court is plaintiff State of Oregon’s motion for summary order challenging the jurisdiction of this court to grant injunctive relief against the State of Oregon. The State of Oregon’s motion involves (1) the nature and extent of a state’s immunity from suit in federal court under the eleventh amendment to the United States Constitution, and (2) what constitutes a waiver of that immunity.

Plaintiff State of Oregon brought this declaratory judgment action against defendants in state court, seeking a declaration that the incorporation, existence,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. California Independent System Operator Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Edmondson v. Magnolia Marine Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1993
  4. Schrader v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1986
  5. Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API