Legal Opinion · Dissent

A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 5, 1969No. A.R.D. 250; Entry No. 961416, etcPublished

1Dissent

DISSENTING IN PART

Richardson, Judge:

While I fully subscribe to the views expressed by the majority in arriving at the conclusion that it was not illegal for the appraisers to undertake the appraisement of the merchandise at bar under the American selling price formula, I cannot Subscribe to the majority’s view that the instant record supports the appraise-ments returned herein under that formula and upheld by the court below, and accordingly, I am contrained to dissent from that phase of the majority’s disposition of the instant application for review.

With respect to the matter of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Japan Import Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Mutual Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. United States v. Mutual Supply Co.United States Customs Court · 1948
  5. Japan Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API