Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, Judge:
This case was brought at Seattle, Wash., and tried partly there and completed in San Francisco and Los Angeles before a single judge of this court on circuit duty on the Pacific coast.
The local appraiser had appraised the rubber-soled shoes involved at the American selling price of an American shoe which he claimed to be comparable, President Hoover having advanced the statutory amount of duty by changing the method of valuation to the American selling price of a comparable American article defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, from the previously existing foreign…
2Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Gothic Watch Co.United States Customs Court · 1949
- Mutual Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Glassberg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Mutual Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.