Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Sea Quest, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 19, 1998No. 2:97-cv-00232PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for the Determination or Choice of Arkansas Law or, in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to Amend, filed on October 20, 1997, and Defendant’s Motion to Apply Indiana Law, filed on October 22,1997. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED, and Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

Paul Thornton (“Thornton”) was a resident of Indiana, employed by Bethlehem Steel Company. Thornton was a relatively experienced scuba diver. He purchased two Sea Quest Spectrum scuba diving regulators from The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Robert Eckstein v. Balcor Film InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. General Motors Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Aircraft Accident at Little Rock, ArkansasDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2002
  3. Judge v. Pilot Oil Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
  4. Ronald Hughes v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  5. Ronald Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API