Legal Opinion

Jackson v. LOCAL 542, OPERATING ENGINEERS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 16, 2001No. CIV. A. 00-854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

Presently before the court is plaintiffs Willie Lee Jackson, et al.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Clarification of the Special Master’s Appointment and/or for Removal of the Case from the Special Master and defendant Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers’ (“Local 542”) Opposition thereto. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, former employees of a landfill operation known as Waste Management of Pennsylvania, Inc., Geological Reclamation Operations and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Tallulah Morgan v. John J. Kerrigan, Boston Home and School Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, Kevin H. White, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. Clara M. HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARDS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. Merle R. Jenkins v. Michael A. SterlacciCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Brock v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 542 District 1District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API