Stout v. Stinnett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The eity of North Little Rock, by appropriate procedure, has adopted the provisions of Act 28 of the Acts of the Legislature of 1933, commonly referred to as the Civil Service Commission Act, (now appearing as §§ 9945-9964 in Pope’s Digest).
May 27, 1946, the city council of North Little Rock enacted Ordinance No. 1464. Its purpose was, according to the preamble, “An Ordinance Reorganizing the Police Department of the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas: Prescribing Certain Officers ’ Duties: Fixing the Rate of Pay: and for Other Purposes.”
Section 1 of the ordinance provided that the police…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sanches v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Stage v. MacKieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Ellis v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Fiveash v. HoldernessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Connor v. Ricks, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Connor v. Ricks, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC; And Arkansas Racing Commission v. Gulfside Casino PartnershipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.