Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moran v. Fabergé, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 3, 1975No. [No. 23, September Term, 1974.]Published

1Dissent

O’Donnell, J,

dissenting:

I concur that my learned brethren have correctly set forth the general principles of a manufacturer’s liability for negligent failure to warn of a latent danger in his product as posited in Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388 (1965), and our holdings thereunder in Twombley v. Fuller Brush Co., 221 Md. 476, 492, 158 A. 2d 110, 118 (1960); Katz v. Arundel-Brooks Concrete Corp., 220 Md. 200, 203, 151 A. 2d *556731, 733 (1959); and Kaplan v. Stein, 198 Md. 414, 420-21, 84 A. 2d 81, 84 (1951). That section in the Restatement, as well as our holdings under it, emphasizes a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  2. Tampa Drug Company v. WaitSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Martin v. Bengue, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Bramble v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API