Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Canfield

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 25, 1970No. 24026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

This case involves review on writ of error of a decision in the district court reversing the findings of the Indus*20trial Commission in a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

On March 20, 1966 George Canfield, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, was injured in the course of his employment with the Centennial Turf Club, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the employer. Although the claimant sought medical treatment for his injuries the day following the accident and left his employment in June, 1966, he did not report the accident to his employer until some time shortly before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Boulder v. PayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Industrial Commission v. Newton Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coy v. Dover Corp./Norris DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. City and County of Denver v. MooreColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Industrial Commission v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API