Legal Opinion
Accu-Tech Corp. v. Jackson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 20, 2005No. 03-71575PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [68] AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S . MOTION IN LIMINE [41]
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
There are two matters before the Court: Defendant’s motion in limine and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The issues' Defendánt presents in the motion in limine are not appropriately addressed at this time; that motion is therefore DENIED. The summary judgment motion requires the Court to interpret the scope of the Michigan Builders’ Trust Fund Act, MiCH. Comp. Laws §§ 570.151 et seq. (“MBTFA”). Because the MBTFA can apply here and for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Harry Herbert Wagner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Performance Contracting Inc. v. DynaSteel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Henry v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Behler-Young Co. v. Cousino (In Re Cousino)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Lee Wholesale Supply, Inc. v. Yacos (In Re Yacos)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Richardson v. Checker Acquisition Corp. (In re Checker Motors Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.