Legal Opinion

Boerner v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 7, 1999No. LR-C-98-427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 The plaintiffs have responded to both motions and the Court has heard oral arguments. After careful consideration of the papers and arguments and for the reasons stated below, defendant’s motions are granted in part and denied in part.

Plaintiffs, Mary Jane Boerner and Henry W. Boerner, her husband, filed suit on June 19, 1998, against defendant Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company seeking compensatory and punitive damages for personal injuries and loss of consortium. In the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Mason v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boerner v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
  2. Hambrick v. First Security BankDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API