Legal Opinion
United States v. Gregory Lamont Hardin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2001No. 99-6662PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BORMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Appellant Gregory Lamont Hardin, convicted of narcotics and firearms charges, appeals the district court’s sentencing decision to increase his offense level by four levels pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 2K2.1(b)(5), 1 after concluding that Defendant possessed a firearm “in connection with” another felony offense.
This Court affirms the district court’s determination that the United States had proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Hardin possessed a firearm in connection with another felony offense, to wit, possession…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Scottie Ray HurstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- United States v. Marie Antoinette Jackson-RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ronald Alan EnnengaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Manuel GunnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Leon BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.