Legal Opinion

State v. Spidahl

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2004No. 20030348, 20030349, 20030350, 20030351, 20030352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Terry Spidahl appealed from judgments of conviction for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm, concluding the trial court did not err in denying Spidahl’s motion to suppress evidence.

I

[¶ 2] On March 4, 2003, at approximately 10:30 p.m., Officer Ertelt of the Devils Lake Police Department was patrolling in downtown Devils Lake. He noticed a vehicle, which had been reported stolen several weeks earlier, parked in front of a bar. He ran a check on the VIN number and confirmed that the vehicle had been reported stolen.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sonsthagen v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Obrigewitch v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Henderson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. TerrillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bertram v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. JellebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API