State v. Spidahl
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Terry Spidahl appealed from judgments of conviction for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm, concluding the trial court did not err in denying Spidahl’s motion to suppress evidence.
I
[¶ 2] On March 4, 2003, at approximately 10:30 p.m., Officer Ertelt of the Devils Lake Police Department was patrolling in downtown Devils Lake. He noticed a vehicle, which had been reported stolen several weeks earlier, parked in front of a bar. He ran a check on the VIN number and confirmed that the vehicle had been reported stolen.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Sonsthagen v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Obrigewitch v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Henderson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WoinarowiczNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. TerrillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Bertram v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JellebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.