United States v. Martin Rothman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUHÉ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Martin Rothman contends that in determining his sentence, the district court erred by failing to apply the three-level reduction available to a conspirator arrested before the completion of the offense. Because we consider the degree of completion of the underlying offense, and not of the conspiracy itself, to be the relevant inquiry, we vacate the sentence and remand to the district court for resen-tencing.
Two co-defendants, Joseph Hillner and Charles Howell, initiated a conspiracy to launder money that a third party claimed he had earned through illegal drug…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Juventino Mejia-OroscoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Daniel J. D'Antoni and Richard AlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ramona Jean BurroughsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Johnny McIntyre TolesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. James W. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Carl Jay Waskom, Jr., United States of America v. Edward Taylor, Jr., United States of America v. Shawn Dee Adams, United States of America v. Catherine Dee Adams, United States of America v. Edward Taylor, Jr., United States of America v. Shawn Dee Adams, United States of America v. Catherine Dee AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Larry BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.