Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel J. D'Antoni and Richard Ales
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-1237, 88-1364PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Daniel D’Antoni and Richard Ales challenge their convictions for conspiracy to kill a government witness on several grounds. First, they challenge the district court’s admission into evidence of testimony about statements made by D’Antoni’s brother to a government informant under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule. Second, they argue that admission of these statements was impermissible under Rules 404(b) and 403 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Third, they charge that the district court erred in admitting several tape-recorded…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Miguel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Peter Arvanitis, Stanley Peters, John Yannakis, Perikles Panagiotaros, and Robert RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Scott SophieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William J. BensonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.