Legal Opinion
Fitzner Pontiac-Buick-Cadillac v. Smith
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1988No. 57901PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
523 So.2d 324 (1988)
FITZNER PONTIAC-BUICK-CADILLAC, INC.
v.
Vertis B. SMITH.
No. 57901.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
April 13, 1988.
Robert B. Prather, Columbus, for appellant.
J. Tyson Graham, Graham & Segrest, Columbus, for appellee.
Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and ANDERSON, JJ.
ROBERTSON, Justice, for the court:
I
This case is about Buyer's efforts to recover what he paid for a used car which he kept 291 days and never gave Seller a chance to fix. Conceding the car's not infrequent illnesses over that time to have rendered it nonmerchantable, the economic waste avoidance policy within…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paymaster Oil Mill Company v. MitchellMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
- Beck Enterprises, Inc. v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Rester v. MorrowMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Asciolla v. Manter Oldsmobile-Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- JL Teel Co., Inc. v. Houston United SalesMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by47 opinions
- UHS-Qualicare, Inc. v. GULF COAST COM. HOSP., INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Corley v. EvansMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. GrimesMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Solanki v. ErvinMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.