Legal Opinion

City of Kalamazoo v. Kts Industries, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2004No. Docket 251199PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGage, J.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted the trial court order denying plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ jury demand regarding the issue of necessity in this condemnation action. We reverse.

The dispute at issue requires this Court to analyze the procedural aspects of a condemnation case to determine whether a property owner is entitled to a jury trial concerning the necessity of the condemnation. This controversy should have been relatively easy to resolve since condemnation statutes are usually specific in nature. However, in this case, we are faced with two conflicting statutes, one that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Robertson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Malcolm v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. By Lo Oil Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Apsey v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Watts Regulator Company v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Kaczynski v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Bengston v. Delta CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API