Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDERS
ROBERT D. MORGAN, District Judge.
By its complaint herein, plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment that Fred-man Patent No. 3,118,151 was invalid, or, if valid, that it was not infringed by plaintiff’s accused product. Subsequent to the filing of the complaint, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a judgment in another cause finding claim 3 of that patent invalid and finding claim 4 thereof valid, but not infringed by the accused products there involved. Fredman v. Harris-Hub Company, Inc., 442 F.2d 210 (7 Cir. 1971). On August 24, 1971, 330 F.Supp. 978, this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Rohm & Haas Company v. Roberts Chemicals, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Harry Fredman v. Harris-Hub Company, Inc., Harry Fredman v. Estee Sleep Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Schenk v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
- Application of John F. CorrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wayne-Gossard Corp. v. Moretz Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1974
- Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company v. Fredman Brothers Furniture Company, Inc., and Harry Fredman, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Harry Fredman, Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. v. Fredman Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975