Legal Opinion

In re Jackson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 2012No. Nos. 11-FM-1123, 11-FM-1467PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Senior Judge:

We consolidated and expedited consideration of these appeals because they involve *531significant prosecutorial and procedural due process issues relating to the enforcement of civil protection orders (“CPO”) under the District of Columbia’s intrafamily offenses statute, D.C.Code §§ 16-1001, et seq., and because trial court judges have interpreted our case law and the statute in different ways, and hence have followed different procedures in these types of criminal contempt cases. In appeal no. 11-FM-1123, the government filed a motion asking us to reverse in part, and vacate…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Benoit O. Brookens, II v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Caruso (Samuel) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API