Legal Opinion

Michaut v. McCart

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1898No. 8217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of York county. Tried below below Bates, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

McCart recovered a judgment against Michaut before a justice of the peace for $18.15 and costs. Michaut took the case on error to the district court, where the judgment was affirmed. These proceedings seek a reversal of the judgment of affirmance. The assignments of error raise the question of the sufficiency of the justice’s findings to support the judgment rendered.

The entry on the docket of the justice is as follow's: “After hearing the evidence on both sides, and argument, it is considered by me that the plaintiff shall recover of the defendant the sum of $18.15 and costs of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ransdell v. PutnamNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Rhodes v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fowler v. ThomsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Garber v. SprayWyoming Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API