Ransdell v. Putnam
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Madison county. Tried below before Barnes, J. cited: Gould’s Pleadings, § 56. TJhlig v. Garrison, 2 N. W. R., 258. Semple v. Hoilman, 3 Gilm., 131. Smith v. Silvis, 8 Neb., 167. cited: Degering v. Flieh, 14 Neb., 448. Freeman judgments, §§ 53-55. Chureh v. Grossman, 41 Iowa, 373. Garret v. Wood, 3 Kan., 231.
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ci-i. J.*
This case was originally tried before a justice of the peace. The plaintiff’s cause of action was stated in his bill of particulars, as follows: “Plaintiff says that defendants Ransdell and Reed- are justly indebted to him in the *643sum of one hundred and twenty-five dollars on account of work and labor performed by the plaintiff for defendants at their request after the fifteenth day of September, 1881, and before the commencement of. this action. Plaintiff further says that the defendants have totally failed and refused to pay him the said sum of money so due for said services,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kirkwood v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Maryott v. GardnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Rhodes v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- McNamara & Duncan v. CabonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
- Black v. CabonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.