Anglo American Trading Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
Plaintiff says it had contracts for the purchase of meat in New Zealand, which it intended to sell in this country and which it could have sold at a stated profit, but that it was prevented from securing the meat by the imposition by the Government of New Zealand of an embargo on the shipment of meats to this country. It says the Government of New Zealand was induced by the United States and Great Britain to put on this embargo, and, hence, it concludes that the United States took its meat and so is required by the Fifth Amendment to pay it for it.
For more than one reason plaintiff is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gothwaite v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
- Froemming Bros., Inc., of Texas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Hallman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
- J. F. Barbour & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allan C. Miller and Betty G. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978