Mercer v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge:
The civil contempt power of the United States courts is limited to “the least possible power adequate to the end proposed.” Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) 204, 231, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821). The appellants (the County)1 claim that the district court exceeded this power by fining the County $30,600 for operating a county jail in violation of prior court orders. Although we will vacate a district court’s exercise of its contempt power only when we find that the court abused its discretion, see Sizzler Family Steak Houses v. Western Sizzlin Steak House, Inc., 793 F.2d 1529,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Madrid v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. HyattCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Green Point Credit, LLC v. McLean (In Re McLean)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Alberti v. KlevenhagenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.