Knust v. Wilkins
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} A husband and wife contend in this appeal that they should not be required to pay Ohio personal income tax on the income earned by two trusts that they created. The Tax Commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) concluded, however, that the trusts’ income passed through the trusts and was taxable to the husband and wife themselves. That conclusion was a sound one, and we therefore affirm the BTA’s decision.
*332Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} The appellants — David G. Knust and Susan Purkrabek-Knust — are a married couple in Cincinnati. They established a corporation in 1983 called…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- William E. Neely and Irene R. Neely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Standards Testing Laboratories, Inc. v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Renacci v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- WCI Steel, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Gibson v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Lovell v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.