Legal Opinion

Veasley ex rel. Veasley v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 12, 2016No. CASE NO. 12-cv-3053-WQH-WVGPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAYES, Judge

The matter before the Court is the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs bring this action for medical negligence against the United States of America pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680.1 On October 27, 2015, the Court held a nine-day bench trial, at which it heard testimony and received exhibits.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

I. Factual Background

A. Placement of Intrauterine Device

In April 2008, Mildred Veasley (“Veas-ley”) delivered her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brooks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (PC) Branson v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. (PC) Doiel v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. (PC) Ellis v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Kaleb Gilvin v. Veneto Tuscan LLC; Karsaz Law; Does 1-10District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  5. Martinez v. Kaweah Delta Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API