Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Kraemer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1895No. 19447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This action was brought under section 2941 of the Civil Code, of which the following is a copy:

“ Sec. 2941. When any mortgage has been satisfied ■the mortgagee or his assignee must immediately, on the demand of the mortgagor, execute, acknowledge, and deliver to him a certificate of the discharge thereof, so as to entitle it to be recorded, or he must enter satisfaction, or cause satisfaction of such mortgage to be entered of record; and any mortgagee, or assignee of such mortgagee, who refuses to execute, acknowledge, and deliver to the mortgagor the certificate of discharge, or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Thomas v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Perkins v. Chad Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API