Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Mobile Light & Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1925No. 1 Div. 365PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In counts declaring on' simple negligence, subsequent negligence, and wantonness, appellant sought to recover damages of appellee for injuries to himself and his automobile, resulting from a collision with appellee’s street car being operated in the city of Mobile. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court gave for the defendant the affirmative charge at its request, and from the judgment following, plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal.

The collision occurred about 7 o’clock in the evening in October of 1923. It had been raining’ intermittently for about five days, and on this night there…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. So. Ry. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Johnson v. Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Carlisle v. Alabama Great Southern RailwaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. HeidtmuellerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Kendrick v. BIRMINGHNA SOUTHERN R. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Emmett v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Scotch Lumber Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API