Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Thekan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The principal relief prayed for is an abate•ment of the nuisance and an injunction prohibiting the use of such premises for the purpose of selling therein nonintoxicating beverages, upon the ground that such premises are so used as a cover for the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors.

Under the provisions of sub. (30), sec. 165.01, Stats., the possession of intoxicating liquor on or about the licensed premises is prohibited. Sub. (22), sec. 165.01, provides as follows:

“Any room, house, building, ... or place where intoxicating liquor is manufactured, sold or. kept in violation of *44any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zodrow v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Pennell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Stoughton ClubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cowie v. La Crosse Theaters Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. United Food Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Schachtner v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Martin v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API