Legal Opinion

Putz v. Putz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1978No. 50054PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Justice:

The pivotal issue in this case is whether an after-acquired homestead purchased by a husband and his second wife is subject to a prior alimony judgment lien on the husband’s real estate obtained by the first wife pursuant to a divorce decree.

The parties are in agreement on the facts. On March 4, 1971, Katherine Putz, Appellant herein, obtained a decree of divorce from Herbert J. Putz, Appellee, in the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma. That court awarded her an alimony judgment of $15,000.00, payable in installments of $125.00 per month, with the payments to cease upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Davis Ex Rel. Grant v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Haven v. TrammellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Gardner v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Horan v. HoranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MobleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Breedlove v. BreedloveNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Breedlove v. BreedloveNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API