Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1993No. 22913PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant and cross-respondent William Cody Kelly (“Kelly”) appeals the district court’s judgment concluding that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency land-use regulations did not deprive him of all economically viable use of his property and, therefore, did not effect a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution requiring payment of just compensation. We affirm the district court’s judgment.
In addition, respondent and cross-appellant Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”) cross-appeals the district court’s judgment that a prior federal district…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- McCarran International Airport v. SisolakNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
- Committee for Reasonable Regulation of Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- Kelly, Trustee v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McCarran International Airport v. SisolakNevada Supreme Court · 2006