In re Clark
New York County Courts
Motion to confirm, an inquisition and for the appointment of a committee, in proceedings instituted under title 6 of chapter 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the CourtKnapp, J.
The petition of Howland P. Wells, a brother-in-law of the alleged incompetent, accompanied by an affidavit of Collins Payne and Mary E. Payne, was presented to this court July 24, 1899, and”an order granted thereon, appointing a commissioner, as provided by section 2327 of the Code. The usual proceedings under sections 2330 and 2331 of the Code have been had, and the inquisition is now returned, which is duly signed by the commisr sioner and jurors, finding that said Eugene P. Clark is an incompetent person, and this motion is made for its confirmation and for the appointment of á committee.
Mr…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re MasonNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- In re MorganNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- In re BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- In re RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1881
- In re BrughNew York Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conyne v. McGibbonNew York Supreme Court · 1942