Legal Opinion

Conyne v. McGibbon

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1942Published

1Opinion of the CourtImrie, J.

Defendant moves under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order “directing that judgment he entered herein dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action has no merit, and that the plaintiff is not the real party in interest to, and has no right, title or interest in the property of Florence L. Conyne, and for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem just and proper.”

Rule 113 provides, obviously, a drastic remedy; one seeking its relief must bring himself clearly within the provisions of the rule.

*55Defendant’s ground for relief under that rule, if any, is found…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Warren v. . Union Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Matter of BlewittNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In re TracyNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  4. Gridley v. . College of St. Francis XavierNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. In re RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API