Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Murphy

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 26, 1988No. 56,897; ACM 25477Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEverett, Chief Judge

I

In United States v. Deain, 5 U.S.C.M.A. 44, 17 C.M.R. 44 (1954), this Court invalidated an arrangement whereunder a Navy Admiral served as permanent president of a general court-martial and submitted to the convening authority fitness reports on two other members of the court-martial. Although we expressed doubt that the impartiality of a court-martial member would be negated simply because one was “the normal reporting senior of the other,” id. at 52, 17 C.M.R. at 52, we concluded that, under the circumstances, the “freedom and independence of action” of the two members had been unduly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API