Legal Opinion
Matter of Certain Amendments to Adopted and Approved Solid Waste Management Plan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 18, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
275 N.J. Super. 375 (1994)
646 A.2d 463
IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ADOPTED AND APPROVED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.
HUDSON MEADOWS URBAN RENEWAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND TOWN OF KEARNY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 7, 1994.
Decided July 18, 1994.
Before Judges MICHELS, SKILLMAN and WEFING.
Gary Bennett argued the cause for appellant Town of Kearny and Stacy S. Weinstein…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Newark v. Natural Resource Council in the Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Pascucci v. VagottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- A. A. Mastrangelo, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. KandleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. KandleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Infinity Broadcasting v. NJ MEADOWLANDSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- ERG Container Services, Inc. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Holgate Property Associates v. Township of HowellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995