Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Beadle

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 9, 1930No. 40406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

This is an action at law, and the trial was begun to a jury; but at the close of the evidence, the parties stipulated that the jury should be discharged, and the findings made by the court. We find it unnecessary to determine all of the questions which have been argued. The parties concede that it is an action at law, and, it having been tried as such, the decision of the trial court on questions of fact has the same weight, force, and effect, as would the verdict of a jury; and if there is evidence, and the fair inferences to be drawn therefrom, from which the trial court could properly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loranz & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Scott v. People's Monthly Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. National Bank v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Frankel Frank & Co. v. August Levi & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Gregerson Bros. v. J. G. Cherry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Wilson v. KelsoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Beery v. GlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Federal Land Bank v. SherburneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API