Legal Opinion

In re West

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1935No. Crim. No. 2779PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

This matter comes before this court pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus, after a conviction had in the superior court was affirmed by the District Court of Appeal,—People v. West, 3 Cal. App. (2d) 568 [40 Pac. (2d) 278],—which decision has now become final.

Obviously, if the two counts in the amended indictment charged an identical offense in identical language, the defendant could not be convicted upon both counts. The proper method of procedure, if an identical offense was charged in identical language, would have been to dismiss one count, but as this is not the fact in this case, it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re NorthcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Matter of Application of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. In re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API