Legal Opinion

Barrow v. Abramowicz

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 7, 2007No. 486, 2006PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, Kathleen Barrow, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of Robert J. Barrow et ah, appeals a Superior Court jury verdict in which the jury found Defendant-appel-lee, Carl Abramowicz, M.D., negligent in his care of Barrow, but not liable for Barrow’s death because his negligence was not a proximate cause of harm to Barrow.

The Barrows focus their arguments on two errors the trial judge allegedly made. They claim that the trial judge erred when he did not permit the testimony of Dr. Abramowicz’ medical expert that was favorable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sammons v. Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Eustice v. RupertSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Watts v. Delaware Coach Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1948
  4. Green v. Alfred A.I. DuPont Institute of the Nemours FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Bush v. HMO of Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Americas Mining Corp. v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. Abbey Fry v. Andrew Blauvelt D/B/A Bluefield Trust ConstructionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Sheehan v. Oblates of St. Francis de SalesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. Olson v. HalvorsenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Cuonzo v. ShoreSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API