Legal Opinion

Olson v. Halvorsen

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 15, 2009No. 338, 2009PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

Brian Olson, the plaintiff below appellant, claims that his investing partners orally amended their LLC’s compensation provisions. The Vice Chancellor held that Olson failed to prove an amendment, and that the statute of frauds applies to LLC operating agreements, making the alleged oral amendment nonenforceable. Olson asserts that applying the statute of frauds to LLC agreements contravenes the General Assembly’s intent to give LLC agreements maximum effect. Because the trial court committed no legal error and the record supports the Vice Chancellor’s contractual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Haveg Corporation v. GuyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Barrow v. AbramowiczSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. KempSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Feeley v. Nhaocg, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
  3. Culverhouse v. Paulson & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Parkcentral Global, L.P. v. Brown Investment Management, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  5. CSH Theatres, LLC v. Nederlander of San Francisco AssociatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API