Legal Opinion
Hickman v. Simplay3 Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 29, 2023No. 5:21-cv-01991Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AMANDA HICKMAN, ) CASE NO. 5:21-CV-01991 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ) vs. ) ) THE SIMPLAY3 CO.. ) ORDER AND DECISION ) (Resolves Doc. 13) Defendants. ) ) ) ) This matter is before the Court on Defendant The Simplay3 Company’s (“Simplay”) motion for summary judgment. Doc. 13. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. I. FACTS Simplay is a local company that designs and manufactures children’s toys and furniture, among other products.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Barton Willoughby, D/B/A Willoughby FarmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.