Frey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Appellant files an able and extended motion for rehearing, supported by a brief of authorities and oral argument, showing research and care. He contends that we should have considered and held error the refusal of the court to continue the case. This action of the court was not made the subject of complaint in a bill of exceptions. Without such bill the matter is not properly before us. Hollis v. State, 9 Tex. Crim. App. 646; Trevino v. State, 38 Tex. Crim. Rep. 64; Gray v. State, 100 Tex. Crim. Rep. 195, 272 S. W. 469; Payne v. State, 100 Tex. Crim.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925