Legal Opinion

Stevens v. City of Chariton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 27, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Lucas District' Court. — Seneca Cornell, Judge. Action to recover damages consequent upon a fall, resulted in a judgment for tlie plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

*601. Trial : inconsistent findings. *59I. Court Avenue of the city of Chariton extends east and west. In the sidewalk, four feet in width and *60on the north side thereof, between Sixth and Seventh Streets, as is alleged, there was allowed by yle defendant, during November, 1915, and the year previous, “to exist a dangerous place in said sidewalk, due to a demolition of a prior existing sidewalk, upon which were scattered loose and broken bricks, and bricks protruding from an uneven surface of the ground, the ground at the time of the accident herein complained of being frozen and-irregular and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schulte v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. Gibson v. City of DenisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Hanson v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. McGee v. Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Reynolds v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beach v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Scott, Admr. v. Bradford National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API