Legal Opinion

State v. Ruiz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 2, 2008No. 05C45322; A129934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

The state appeals an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from a warrantless search of his automobile. The state contends that the seizure without a warrant was lawful under the state constitution because of the exigent circumstances of the automobile’s mobility or, alternatively, because the search was incident to defendant’s arrest. We agree that the search was reasonable under the state constitution because of exigent circumstances and reverse the order granting defendant’s motion to suppress.

Trooper Madsen stopped defendant’s vehicle because it was weaving for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. KostaOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Roop v. PARKER NORTHWEST PAVING, CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API