Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lustig v. Legat

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 1, 1946No. Patent Appeals 5155PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

The senior party, Egon Lustig, appeals here from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the single count involved in this interference to the junior party, Robert C. Legat.

The interference involves patent No. 2,-224,082, granted December 3, 1940, to Legat upon an application filed August 30, 1939, and an application of Lustig, filed November 18, 1941, for reissue of original patent No. 2,238,653, granted April 15, 1941, upon an application filed December 6, 1938. The Lustig application and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
  2. Payne v. HurleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. Taylor v. SwingleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  4. Bowers v. ValleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. Sachs v. WadsworthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Arthur W. Schnick v. Lawrence E. FennCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Applegarth v. WilsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Application of William L. Hartop, Jr., and Edward P. BrandesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Lewis E. Walkup v. Harold G. GreigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API