Legal Opinion

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Lane County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 1990No. LUBA 89-132; CA A64166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

ORS 197.763 establishes a general requirement that a party must raise issues before the local decision-making body in order to raise them in appeals to LUBA. The statute also creates notice and procedural requirements to facilitate the presentation and preservation of issues at the local level. Through amendments to section 14.300(5) of its code, Lane County adopted procedures aimed at implementing ORS 197.763. 1000 Friends of Oregon (petitioner) appealed those amendments to LUBA, contending that the county provisions violate the statute in two respects. LUBA concluded that the ordinance is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Apalategui v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Lane County v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hausam v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API