Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Joyce)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1984No. 19-11004PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The predominant issue in the controversy at bench is whether a creditor has violated the Truth In Lending Act (“the TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667e, due to alleged shortcomings in the disclosure statement issued by the creditor. For the reasons stated herein, we find that the debtor has established her entitlement to relief under the TILA.

The facts of this case are as follows: 1 The debtor contracted to purchase an automobile from a car dealer which dealer directed the debtor to arrange financing with Fidelity Consumer Discount Company (“Fidelity”).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Hanna v. Lomas & Nettleton Co. (In Re Hanna)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Anderson v. Automobile FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. In Re EinspahrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Werts v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Andrews v. Fleet Real Estate Funding Corp. (In Re Andrews)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API