Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN A. FOGLEMAN, Justice.
Lee Edward Smith was found guilty of burglary of the residence of William Montague and grand larceny of two typewriters and a television set which were taken therefrom. As a basis for reversal appellant contends firstly, that “his confession should have been suppressed because it was induced by violence and, thus, was involuntary” and secondly, that the evidence to sustain the conviction was insufficient, because the evidence. other than the challenged confession, was more exculpatory than incriminating.
Upon the basis of our decision in Smith v. State, 254 Ark. 538,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Mercer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Stevens v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Farr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Gammel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Fairchild v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.