Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1974No. 5811PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN A. FOGLEMAN, Justice.

Lee Edward Smith was found guilty of burglary of the residence of William Montague and grand larceny of two typewriters and a television set which were taken therefrom. As a basis for reversal appellant contends firstly, that “his confession should have been suppressed because it was induced by violence and, thus, was involuntary” and secondly, that the evidence to sustain the conviction was insufficient, because the evidence. other than the challenged confession, was more exculpatory than incriminating.

Upon the basis of our decision in Smith v. State, 254 Ark. 538,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Mercer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Stevens v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Farr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Gammel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Foreman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Fairchild v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API