Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Farley

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1988No. 88-SC-000065-DGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

The question is whether a warning of a dangerous condition in the premises given by the occupier of the premises to an independent contractor absolves the occupier of the premises from liability to an employee of a subcontractor who sustained an injury by reason of that condition of the premises. We hold that it does. The appellant, Ral-ston Purina Company, the owner and occupier of a building, employed R & W Construction Company, Inc., an independent contractor, to construct an addition to the building. R & W Construction Company subcontracted with Condo Manufacturing Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corporation v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Storm v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Galveston-Houston Electric Railway Co. v. ReinleTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hercules Powder Company v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Levesque v. Fraser Paper LimitedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hargis v. BaizeKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Brewster v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Nora Johnson, Administratrix of the Estate of Melvin Mattingly, Deceased v. S.O.S. Transport, Inc., Central Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Lane v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Pennington v. MeadWestvaco Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API