Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2009No. 2006-SC-000584-DG, 2007-SC-000366-DGPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice MINTON.

I. INTRODUCTION.

Decades after working on projects in various premises owners’ buddings, an independent contractor’s employee developed asbestosis, the cause of which the employee claimed arose from exposure to asbestos while working in the various buildings. Assuming that asbestos exposure occurred on the premises as the employee claimed, under what circumstances can the premises owners be held liable for the employee’s disease? Did the owners have a duty to warn of the presence and potential dangers of asbestos, which at one time was used…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Foster v. LeggettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  4. Lanier v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Amear v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. CertainTeed Corp. v. DexterKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Saleba v. SchrandKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Auslander Props., LLC v. NalleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. McCarty v. Covol Fuels No. 2, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
  5. Dexter v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2019

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API