Legal Opinion
W. M. Gullicksen Manufacturing Co. v. MacNeil
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 3, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
These are appeals by the respondents from two decrees of the Probate Court of Norfolk County. The controversy arises out of the conflicting claims of the petitioner (Gullicksen) and of the respondent Laurence E. Bunker to two lots of land in Wellesley known as the Curtis Spring lot and the Hurd Spring lot. The other respondents are Elinor Bishop MacNeil and Mary C. Bishop, the heirs of Robert Bishop, late of Wellesley, and the only persons with an interest in a trust created under his will; and Mr. J. Haller Ramsey, a trustee under the said will appointed on March 1,1963.
The probate judge…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hyde Park Savings Bank v. DavankoskasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Andrews v. CharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Williams v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Thayer v. . FintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Eldridge v. EldridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Meyer v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- Olsson v. WaiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Reilly v. Local 589, Amalgamated Transit UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Tucker v. BowenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.