DePlanche v. Califano
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both the Plaintiff and Defendant pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Summary Judgment is appropriate only where no genuine issue of material fact remains to be decided and the Plaintiff or Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Willetts v. Ford Motor Company, 583 F.2d 852, 855 (CA 6 1978); Felix v. Young, 536 F.2d 1126, 1130 (CA 6 1976); Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(c). A court may not resolve disputed questions of fact in a summary…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hudson v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Torres v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Joe Dickerson & Associates, LLC v. DittmarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Windsor v. a Federal Executive AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
- Lee v. Dayton Power and Light Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.