Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Rushing
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 15, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Bosque County. Tried below before Hon. O. L. Lockett.
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Associate Justice.
The appellees -were the owners of a tract of land situated in the suburbs of Walnut Springs in Bosque County, a portion of which they had mapped and platted, caused a copy to be placed of record in the office of the county clerk of that county, and designated it as “Fairview and Roundhouse Addition to Walnut Springs, Texas.” Being desirous of selling those lots, on the 34th day of July, 1906, they entered into the following contract with the appellant Mitchell: .
“This instrument is intended to witness the following contract, executed in duplicate, this day entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Soell v. HaddenTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Deacon v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Broumel v. RaynerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Pate v. VardemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Rushing v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911